Join | Home | Directory | Book | Telemarketers | Law | Links | Site Map
---------------
PCI Logo
S P A M
If you receive spam (junk e-mail) that contains a
misleading statement, the Federal Trade Commission
wants to know about it.
---------------
 
Forward all such junk e-mail to the F.T.C. at spam@ftc.gov
 
---------------
 
For a list of state spam laws, click here .
 
---------------
 
Pending Federal Legislation
 The U.S. House of Representatives

More than 100 Congressional Reps cosponsored H.R. 718
(The Email Bill)
It would protect us from unsolicited / unwanted junk e-mail (spam).

Most recent status - 6/5/2001: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 43.
The bill would require all spam to have an accurate return address, make it illegal to send junk e-mail to those who have asked to be removed from a distribution list, require spam to be labeled, and require ISP's to let their customers opt-out of receiving it. The bill also sets a penalty for sending junk e-mail after someone has asked for it to stop. Pursuant to the bill, ISP's may sue spammers $500 per violative message.
Not surprisingly, the Direct Marketing Association opposes HR 718
and has sent its paid lobbyists to testify against it before Congress.

The text of the bill follows:

A BILL

To protect individuals, families, and Internet service providers from unsolicited and unwanted electronic mail.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND POLICY.

their children receive unsolicited commercial electronic mail.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

SEC. 4. CRIMINAL PENALTY FOR UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL ELECTRONIC MAIL CONTAINING FRAUDULENT ROUTING INFORMATION.

SEC. 5. OTHER PROTECTIONS AGAINST UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL ELECTRONIC MAIL.

such message with actual knowledge that the transmission is prohibited by subsection (a) or subsection (b)(1).

SEC. 6. ENFORCEMENT.

SEC. 7. EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS.

SEC. 8. STUDY OF EFFECTS OF UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL ELECTRONIC MAIL.

SEC. 9. SEPARABILITY.

SEC. 10. EFFECTIVE DATE.

END.